Samrukia: Research Database
Reptilia (Pterosauria) · Late Cretaceous (~70 MYA) · Asia — Kyrgyzstan
Research Note: Samrukia was a pterosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Central Asia (Kyrgyzstan) — significant for being one of the few named pterosaurs from this region and for its large size estimate, suggesting it may have been among the largest Late Cretaceous pterosaurs.
| Research Finding | Status | Grade | Year | Method | Citation | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Buffetaut 2011: Samrukia, a new pterosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Kyrgyzstan Annales de Paleontologie | Confirmed | A | 2011 | Fossil | Buffetaut, Annales de Paleontologie | Taxonomy |
Labita & Martill 2020: New data on pterosaur diversity from the Cretaceous of China Cretaceous Research | Confirmed | B | 2020 | Fossil | Labita & Martill, Cretaceous Research | Diversity |
What We Still Do Not Know About Samrukia
- Complete skeletal morphology: Known from partial jaw material.
- Wingspan estimates: Uncertain due to fragmentary remains.
- Phylogenetic placement.
- Diet and ecological role.
In Depth
Samrukia is a genus that illustrated the dangers of naming prehistoric creatures by only partial remains. The original describers of Samrukia (Naish et al.) had a single jawbone that was first thought to belong to an ovirapotosaurian theropod dinosaur, but then later thought to belong to a bird. This raised a lot of eyebrows at the time because the jaw was twice as long as that of an ostrich, so on the surface it seemed that not only had the birds appeared relatively recently, but they had already evolved into large bipedal forms similar to some later forms such as the largest phorusrhacid birds.
There was however a fundamental flaw to the original describers methods of identification. When comparing known features (autapomorphies) of the original jaw bone, the original describers looked at birds, but they did not look at pterosaurs, the group of flying reptiles that were common during the Mesozoic. This was pointed out by another palaeontologist named Eric Buffetaut who insisted that the holotype fossil of Samrukia belonged to a genus of pterosaur. After this one of the original describers Darren Naish has also agreed that the holotype fossil belongs to a pterosaur, not a bird. At the time of writing, Samrukia is more widely believed to have been a pterosaur, not a bird.
The pterosaurs were still quite common during the late Cretaceous with the known species of birds from that time being no threat to their dominance of the skies. Samrukia is considered to have been a pterodactyloid pterosaur which can be loosely described as an advanced form that first began to appear at the end of the Jurassic period. Unfortunately not much more can be said about the genus because it is still only known by a lower jaw. The lack of teeth also confuse things further because a toothless beak can be used for a variety of feeding methods from fish to small animals to perhaps even fruit. This is actually a common problem in understanding pterosaurs since as the Cretaceous period went on, more and more toothless forms began to appear, and so far only a few well known genera such as Pteranodon have had their diets firmly established.
Further Reading
- Samrukia nessovi, from the Late Cretaceous of Kazakhstan: A large pterosaur, not a giant bird - E. Buffetaut - 2011. - A gigantic bird from the Upper Cretaceous of Central Asia - Darren Naish, Gareth Dyke, Andrea Cau, Fran�ois Escuilli� & Pascal Godefroit - 2012.
