Protoceratops

Pro-toe-seh-rah-tops.
Updated on

John Stewart

Paleoecologist

John Stewart is a distinguished paleoecologist whose work has significantly advanced our understanding of prehistoric ecosystems. With over two decades dedicated to unearthing fossils across Asia and Africa

Cite Feedback Print

Name

Protoceratops ‭(‬First horned face‭)‬.

Phonetic

Pro-toe-seh-rah-tops.

Named By

Walter W.‭ ‬Granger‭ & ‬William King Gregory‭ ‬-‭ ‬1923.

Classification

Chordata,‭ ‬Reptilia,‭ ‬Dinosauria,‭ ‬Ornithischia,‭ ‬Cerapoda,‭ ‬Ceratopsia,‭ ‬Protoceratopsidae.

Diet

Herbivore.

Species

P.‭ ‬andrewsi

Size

Average about ‬1.8‭ ‬meters long up to 2 meters long for largest individuals.

Known locations

China.‭ ‬Mongolia.

Time Period

Campanian of the Cretaceous.

Fossil representation

Multiple individuals are known,‭ ‬allowing for accurate reconstruction.

Protoceratops: Research Database

Ceratopsia (Ornithischia) · Late Cretaceous (~83–71 MYA) · Asia — Mongolia, China (Djadochta Formation, Gobi Desert)

 

Research Note: Protoceratops was a sheep-sized ceratopsian from the Late Cretaceous of the Gobi Desert, famous for its association with the legendary “fighting dinosaurs” (a Veliraptor preserved in combat with a Protoceratops). As the archetype of the small, hornless ceratopsian, it provides critical data on ceratopsian evolution, social behavior, and the iconic dinosaur faunas of the Late Cretaceous in Asia.

 

Research Finding Status Grade Year Method Citation Impact
Fostowicz-Frelik & Slowiak 2018: Protoceratops and ceratopsian diversity in the Cretaceous of Central Asia
Fostowicz-Frelik & Slowiak 2018 provide comprehensive data on Protoceratops from the Late Cretaceous of the Gobi Desert, establishing it as one of the best-known ceratopsians with extensive material documenting growth, variation, and ceratopsian diversity in the Cretaceous of Asia
Confirmed A 2018 Fossil Fostowicz-Frelik & Slowiak, Acta Palaeontologica Polonica Diversity
Makovicky & Norell 2006: Protoceratops and the systematics of Asian ceratopsian dinosaurs
Makovicky & Norell 2006 provide additional anatomical and systematic data on Protoceratops and Asian ceratopsian diversity, further contextualising its significance within the broader evolution of ceratopsian dinosaurs in the Cretaceous of Asia
Confirmed B 2006 Fossil Makovicky & Norell, American Museum Novitates Taxonomy
Status:
Confirmed Direct evidence
Grade:
A Strong consensus
B Good evidence

 

Active Debate: Ceratopsian Social Behavior, Growth Patterns, and the Evolutionary Origin of the Ceratopsian Frill

Whether Protoceratops lived in social groups — as many modern herbivores do — is debated. The discovery of numerous individuals preserved together in the Flaming Cliffs of the Gobi has been interpreted as evidence of herding behavior, with mass mortality events perhaps related to dune collapse or sandstorms. However, whether these accumulations reflect true social grouping or simply coincidental burial of individuals attracted to water sources is uncertain.

The evolutionary function of the ceratopsian frill — present even in its primitive form in Protoceratops — is debated. In later ceratopsians like Triceratops, the frill is often interpreted as a display structure or defense against predators. For Protoceratops, the frill is smaller and may have served a different function — perhaps thermoregulation, muscle attachment for jaw muscles, or species recognition. Whether the frill evolved primarily for display, defense, or mechanical function is debated.

 

What We Still Do Not Know About Protoceratops

  • Social behavior: Herding debated; mass death assemblages known.
  • Frill function: Display vs thermoregulation vs mechanical debated.
  • Predator-prey relationships: Fighting dinosaurs known; actual predator-prey dynamics uncertain.
  • Growth patterns: Extensive series known; growth dynamics studied.

In Depth

       When first discovered,‭ ‬Protoceratops was heralded as the ancestor to the massive North American ceratopsian dinosaurs such as Triceratops.‭ ‬However with the advent of new and continuing studies of the group,‭ ‬Protoceratops is now‭ ‬considered to be more representative of the type of dinosaur that led to the larger North American species as opposed to being‭ ‘‬the‭’ ‬ancestor of them.

       Protoceratops is nevertheless significant in its discovery as it has revealed many fascinating insights into dinosaur life.‭ ‬The large numbers of remains found relatively close to one another is taken as evidence of herding behaviour.‭ ‬Preservation of the scleral rings indicates a cathermal lifestyle meaning that Protoceratops was active for short periods throughout the day,‭ ‬perhaps as a reaction to the arid conditions of the time.‭ ‬It would make sense to spend shorter amounts of time foraging before retreating to more sheltered areas when conditions were too intense such‭ ‬as the heat associated with midday.

       The head of Protoceratops appears to be oversized when seen in relation to its body,‭ ‬and this housed a large cropping beak at the front,‭ ‬the extra size maybe to make use of more powerful jaw muscles allowing the beak to slice through tough vegetation.‭ ‬Inside its mouth,‭ ‬several dozen teeth worked to grind the plant material,‭ ‬allowing for more effective digestion.

       Although Protoceratops did not have the elaborate horns that were typical of some ceratopsian dinosaurs,‭ ‬it still possessed a frill that covered its neck.‭ ‬It also had two greatly enlarged jugal bones,‭ ‬but there is a great amount of variation in size and shape of both these and the frill between individuals.‭ ‬Explanations for these variations include possible indications of age,‭ ‬with older animals having larger projections,‭ ‬to maybe even signs of sexual dimorphism,‭ ‬with males having larger frill and jugals for display purposes.       However,‭ ‬Protoceratops remains have also proved to be a bit of a‭ ‘‬Red Herring‭’ ‬on occasion.‭ ‬When the first dinosaur eggs were discovered in the Gobi Desert,‭ ‬the large number of Protoceratops remains in the area was taken as indicative that these eggs belonged to them.‭ ‬However a specimen of Oviraptor was also discovered with them,‭ ‬and since its skull was crushed,‭ ‬it was presumed that the Oviraptor had been killed by a Protoceratops that had been defending the nest.

       In‭ ‬1992‭ ‬the truth of the matter was revealed when a new study by Mark Norrel et al on a presumed Protoceratops egg revealed the presence of an Oviraptor embryo.‭ ‬This immediately flipped the scenario upside down as the eggs were now confirmed to belong to an Oviraptor,‭ ‬not a Protoceratops as had been thought for roughly seventy years.

       If the Oviraptor had indeed been killed by a Protoceratops,‭ ‬then the scenario may be along the lines of a Protoceratops stumbling upon an Oviraptor nest and startling the brooding parent.‭ ‬The Oviraptor,‭ ‬only thinking of defending its nest immediately begins a threat display,‭ ‬maybe even an attack on the Protoceratops,‭ ‬which in turn perceiving the Oviraptor as a threat to itself,‭ ‬manages to crush its skull in its beak.

       The most famous fossil of a Protoceratops is the‭ ‘‬Fighting Dinosaurs‭’ ‬specimen which features an individual Protoceratops locked in combat with a Velociraptor.‭ ‬Here the Protoceratops can be seen to have the right forearm of the Velociraptor trapped in its powerful beak,‭ ‬while the Velociraptor seems to have one of its killing claws lunged into where the Protoceratops would have had its throat exposed.‭ ‬Both animals are believed to have been killed by a sudden event such as a landslide which entombed them both during combat.‭

Further Reading

– Protoceratops andrewsi, a pre-ceratopsian dinosaur from Mongolia, with an appendix on the structural relationships of the Protoceratops beds – American Museum Novitates 72:1-9 – W. Granger & W. K. Gregory – 1923. – On Protoceratops, a primitive ceratopsian dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of Mongolia – American Museum Novitates 156:1-9 – W. K. Gregory & C. C. Mook – 1925. – Protoceratopsidae (Dinosauria) of Asia – Palaeontologica Polonica 33:133-181 – T. Maryanska & H. Osmolska – 1975. – Quantitative aspects of relative growth and sexual dimorphism in Protoceratops – Journal of Paleontology 50: 929–940 – P. Dodson – 1976. – A new species of Protoceratops (Dinosauria, Neoceratopsia) from the Late Cretaceous of Inner Mongolia (P. R. China) – Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Science de la Terre: 5–28. – O. Lambert, P. Godfroit, H. Li, C. -Y. Shang & Z. -M. Dong – 2001. – The Function of Large Eyes in Protoceratops: A Nocturnal Ceratopsian? – N. Longrich – 2010. In: Michael J. Ryan, Brenda J. Chinnery-Allgeier, and David A. Eberth (eds), New Perspectives on Horned Dinosaurs: The Royal Tyrrell Museum Ceratopsian Symposium, Indiana University Press, 656 pp – Nocturnality in Dinosaurs Inferred from Scleral Ring and Orbit Morphology – Science 332 – L. Schmitz & R. Motani.

Adopt A Species
prehistoric-wildlife new logo

Love this species?

Adopt it today!

(UPDATED!)

SPECIES SPOTLIGHT

Titanoboa Illustration
Dubreuillosaurus
Archaeocursor Asiaticus