Diacodexis

De-ah-cpe-dex-iss.
Cite Feedback Print

Name

Diacodexis.

Phonetic

De-ah-cpe-dex-iss.

Named By

Classification

Chordata,‭ ‬Mammalia,‭ ‬Artiodactyla,‭ ‬Dichobunidae.

Diet

Herbivore.

Species

D.‭ ‬antunesi,‭ ‬D.‭ ‬gazini,‭ ‬D.‭ ‬gracilis,‭ ‬D.‭ ‬ilicis,‭ ‬D.‭ ‬indicus,‭ ‬D.‭ ‬kelleyi,‭ ‬D.‭ ‬metsiacus,‭ ‬D.‭ ‬minutus,‭ ‬D.‭ ‬pakistanensis,‭ ‬D.‭ ‬parvus,‭ ‬D.‭ ‬primus,‭ ‬D.‭ ‬secans,‭ ‬D.‭ ‬woltonensis

Size

Up to‭ ‬50‭ ‬centimetres long.

Known locations

Across Eurasia and North America.

Time Period

Ypresian to Lutetian‭ (‬possibly Bartonian‭) ‬of the Eocene.

Fossil representation

Hundreds of specimens.‭

In Depth

       Diacodexis is an early indicator of the forms that the ungulates‭ (‬hoofed mammals‭) ‬evolved from,‭ ‬though Diacodexis may not have been‭ ‘‬the‭’ ‬ancestor even though it was certainly related to them.‭ ‬The main clue that Diacodexis is a candidate for being an ancestral form of artiodactyl is that while the feet still have five toes,‭ ‬the third and fourth toes were slightly elongated.‭ ‬Through successive generations over the course of millions of years,‭ ‬these two‭ ‬ toes‭ ‬would form the foundation of hooves while the other three toes would reduce to the point of being vestigial.

       In life Diacodexis would have lived in a similar manner to a small deer,‭ ‬remaining hidden in dense undergrowth while browsing and only walking out in the open when absolutely necessary.‭ ‬While its body shape and proportions are indeed similar however,‭ ‬Diacodexis had a much longer tail.‭ ‬The long legs of Diacodexis are proportioned like those of a runner and it‭’‬s possible that if it could not stay hidden from predators,‭ ‬it may have tried running through the undergrowth to escape them.‭ ‬In such a scenario the long legs would also allow Diacodexis to more easily clear ground obstacles like exposed roots and fallen branches than shorter legged pursuers.

Further Reading

– Two new genera of Mammalia from the Wasatch Eocene. – American Naturalist 16(12):1029. – E. D. Cope – 1882. – Diagnoses de trois nouvelles especes de mammiferes du Sparnacien de Provence. – Compte rendu sommaire des seances de la Societe geologique de France 1978(6):286-288. – M. Godinot – 1978. – Revision of the Eocene Wind River Faunas, Early Eocene of Central Wyoming. Part 7. Revision of Diacodexis (Mammalian, Artiodactyla). – Annals of Carnegie Museum 54(14):413-486. – L. Krishtalka & R. K. Stucky – 1985. – Decouverte d’un nouveau Diacodexis (Artiocactyla, Mammalia) dans l’Eoc�ne inf�rieur de Silveirinha, Portugal. Palaeovertebrata 19(1):29-44. – C. Estrav�s & D. E. Russell – 1989. – New earliest Wasatchian mammalian fauna from the Eocene of northwestern Wyoming: composition and diversity in a rarely sampled high-floodplain assemblage. – University of Michigan Papers on Paleontology 28:1-97. – P. D. Gingerich – 1989. – Early Eocene land mammals from Vastan Lignite Mine, District Surat (Gujarat), Western India. – Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India 50(1):101-113. – S. Bajpai, V. V. Kapur, D. P. Das, B. N. Tiwari, N. Saravanan & R. Sharma – 2005. – The mammal fauna of the early Eocene Blackheath Formation of Abbey Wood, London. – Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society 165:1-162. – J. J. Hooker – 2010. – Early Eocene artiodactyls (Mammalia) from western India. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 30(4):1245-1274. – K. Kumar, K. D. Rose, R. S. Rana, L. Singh, T. Smith & A. Sahni – 2010.

SPECIES SPOTLIGHT